Zotero in word how to merge citations full#

a single Zotero insert would deliver two Fields in Word, one for the author only part and one for the year, e.g. How would one get a cite like 'Waller (2008 Waller & Jones, 2009)' that claims is common in psychology if we limit author-only to a single item?ДЄs I understand, the latest detailed writeup of the feature on the forums suggested that author-only and suppress-author checkbox needn't be mutually exclusive, and seems to be working on that same idea given his concern that 'we don't have a mechanism for delivering citation updates that consist of two parts'. Would it perhaps make sense to limit author-only citations to a single item? If 'Smith (2001 Jones 2002)' is expected output for multiple items, would output like that even make sense? Should it be allowed without warning? The items are Smith 2001, Jones 2002? The expected output is then 'Smith (2001 Jones 2002)'? The items are Smith 2001, Smith 2002? The expected output would be 'Smith (2001, 2002)'? How would this feature deal with multiple items if (I understand that precise output depends on the csl style): A little cumbersome, but I hope this is enough to get things started. For the time being, you can set 'author-only' on all items in a citation-the flag will take effect only on the item that comes out in first position, and will be ignored elsewhere. For production, things should probably be re-jigged to pick up the 'author-only' and 'suppress-author' flags on the citation block in input data, rather than individual items. This should be useful for trials chez Zotero. See the local test fixture for an example. To invoke the new formatting element, set 'author-only' on the first-position item (after any sorting occurs). It will draw sort and grouping parameters from cs:citation, so that cs:intext sees the same item in first position. The modded processor recognizes a cs:intext element that is a sibling to cs:citation and cs:bibliography. The processor images in the repo are built, and should work as drop-in replacements for the current master. I've put up a version of the processor to play with, in an intext-element branch. (Although it will be really nice to get a solution in place, I would prefer not to start with a stop-gap solution, just in the interest of reducing the aggregate time needed to reach the finish line.)

Zotero in word how to merge citations full#

In the latter, we'd need to work out what the output (or varieties of output) should look like for a full run of multiple author sets and multiple date sets, and how that should be expressed in CSL. is this going to be used only for single items, or will it be used with multiple-item citations as well? In the former case, we should work out how to handle invalid attempts to invoke it. The best thing at this end (to avoid revisiting the changes) would be to get an agreed extension to CSL in place, and set up cs:author rendering for use when an author-only flag is set.ДЄs for niggles and worries. If it has internal syntax identical to cs:citation, it probably wouldn't be too traumatic to add it to the processor - I did something similar (but much more thorny) to implement modular legal styling not too long ago. It does sound like a cs:author companion to CSL cs:citation and cs:bibliography will be needed. Hi, and sorry for missing the earlier call on this. This would need to be in any guidance you can provide here on how best to proceed? In absence of specifying an вЂњout-of-parenthesesвЂќ format for numeric styles, there could be a default author macro used with author, substitute editor, then translator, and et-al-min='3' et-al-use-first='1'. To fix (2), and suggest a default author macro: To fix (1) properly, we would have to extend CSL ( 'The basic extension to CSL needed for full support would be to have a new citation position value to indicate in-text position.'), but as a stopgap measure maybe there's some way we can hard-code the formatting for APA? Not sure whether that would need to go in citeproc-js or if it could be in Zotero. 'and') and 2) it wouldn't work for numeric styles that don't have an in-text author format defined. As I understand it, we could add an 'Author-Only' option now that would work for most author-date styles, but 1) it would be incorrect for APA and any other styles that wanted different styling inside and outside of parentheses ('&' vs. It seems like citeproc-js already largely supports what we need. See this post and down for the latest summary.

вЂњAccording to Smith (2018)вЂќ and similar patterns